If is restricted by finite boundaries, the D'Alembert solution
does not really apply. To use it anyway, we must somehow extend the
problem to a doubly infinite
-range without boundaries. But our
solution without boundaries should still satisfy the boundary
conditions for the finite range. That is often possible by clever use
of symmetry. An example can clarify that.
The problem is to find the pressure for sound wave propagation in a
tube with one end closed and one end open:
The D'Alembert solution applies to an infinite domain
. So to use the D'Alembert solution, the given
initial conditions, that are valid for
must be extended to
all
. In other words, functions
and
must be
converted into functions
and
that have
values for all
. Of course, in the interval
, they must
stay the same as
and
. Assume now for example that
looks as sketched below:
You might think that you could now simply take to be zero
for all
outside the range of the pipe. The corresponding
D'Alembert solution will satisfy the wave equation everywhere,
including inside the pipe
. That is good, because the wave
equation must indeed be satisfied. Unfortunately, the solution you
get that way will not satisfy the boundary conditions at
and
. So it will still be wrong.
You must select the extension of
to all
so that the correct boundary conditions become automatic.
The way to do it is as follows:
The process is shown for below:
It is OK if you get kinks or discontinuities in your functions and
while creating (anti)symmetry. This happens when
and/or
does not satisfy the given boundary conditions. While then
or
may not have a unique value at the initial time, that
problem will disappear when the time becomes greater than zero.
In the range , the found solution is exactly the same
as for the finite pipe! The solution outside that range can simply be
ignored.