Risk Assessment

     Safety Plan

 Project information:

Team 32: Sinking Safety Autonomous Vehicle Egress System

 

3/2/18

Name of Project

 

Date of submission

Team Member

 

Phone Number

 

e-mail

Zack Bolan

 

941-705-1260

 

Ztb13@my.fsu.edu

Josh Keown

 

859-550-0305

 

Jdk14f@my.fsu.edu

Madeline Kewley

 

321-948-7185

 

Mrk13f@my.fsu.edu

Rolling Scott

 

904-923-8677

 

Rollin1.scott@famu.edu

William Kohler

 

904-304-3202

 

Wlk14@my.fsu.edu

Faculty mentor

 

Phone Number

 

e-mail

Dr. McConomy

 

850-410-6624

 

smcconomy@eng.famu.fsu.edu

Dr. Devine

 

850-410-6378

 

mdevine@eng.famu.fsu.edu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I.          Project description:

Our senior design team is tasked with increasing safety in sinking vehicle accidents by: sensing the vehicle is in a sinking situation,

assisting the passenger’s in egress, and delaying the rate of sink, without adding any potential hazards. The priority of the system

will be to save the lives of the passengers by assisting in escape of the vehicle in less than 90 seconds.

 

 

 

 

 

II.        Describe the steps for your project:

To complete our project, our senior design team had to acquire all materials for our delay, sensing and egress system. To create

our delay function we designed a scale model of 2018 Toyota Corolla and 3D printed it using a Ultimaker 3 printer. We attached

closed cell urethane foam using adhesive to the model car to increase buoyancy. The sensing function includes a pressure

transducer, water detection sensor, and microcontroller to sense true sinking conditions. The egress system involves 2 pin

integrated with our sensing system via microcontroller and bolted to the load holding points in the window regulator track.

The egress system prototype is mounted by a wooden mount constructed with plywood and 2x4’s.

Together these functions are used to increase safety in a sinking vehicle emergency

 

III.       Given that many accidents result from an unexpected reaction or event, go back through the steps of the project and imagine what could go wrong to make what seems to be a safe and well-regulated process turn into one that could result in an accident.  (See examples)

During material handling, minor injuries could occur when handling the window regulator as the steel does have some sharp edges

Electrocution could occur when testing the sensing function if the wiring was not insulated well and made contact with the water

and person testing. Chemical burning could occur if it was accidentally applied to human skin instead of the PLA 3D scale model.

 

 

 

 

IV.       Perform online research to identify any accidents that have occurred using your materials, equipment or process.  State how you could avoid having this hazardous situation arise in your project.

Eye injuries: Saw dust is produced from the cutting of the wood. The collector bag is inefficient in collecting all the dust. The free

flowing dust could cause pain and discomfort to the eyes. Additionally, larger pieces of wood could be ejected by the blade at

forces. This could cause severe injury or blindness. The use of safety glasses is required for the use of any cutting machines.

Physical injuries: Contact with appendages could result in injury and death. Users must have careful attention to the placement

body parts in proximity to the blade in both active and inactive situations. The use of heavy duty gloves is also recommended to

lessen the injury if contact is made. Electrical Injuries: The use of electrical equipment poses the risk of electric shock,

electrocution, burns, fires, and explosions. The use of wearing protective insulation wear will help reduce the risk of electrical

injury. Users should also ensure that the device is deenergized when not in use


 

V.        For each identified hazard or “what if” situation noted above, describe one or more measures that will be taken to mitigate the hazard.  (See examples of engineering controls, administrative controls, special work practices and PPE).

For each scenario above, the engineer should wear safety glasses, insulated gloves, closed toed shoes, and long pants to protect

the engineer from physical and electrical injury.

 

 

 

 

 

 

VI.       Rewrite the project steps to include all safety measures taken for each step or combination of steps.  Be specific (don’t just state “be careful”).

When attaching the foam to the 3D printed car, the engineer must have all protective gear such as safety glasses and apparel that

covers all skin to ensure no chemical injuries occur. When assembling and testing the sensing aspect, the engineer should ensure

the electrical wiring is completely insulated so the electrical components will not touch the water during testing or the engineer.

During construction of the egress system mount, safety glasses and safety apparel should be used to prevent any eye injury or

Irritation due to saw dust when cutting the material. Also, the engineer operating the power miter saw should have be trained and

Comfortable in using the tool.

 

 

VII.     Thinking about the accidents that have occurred or that you have identified as a risk, describe emergency response procedures to use.

Call 911 for injuries, fires or other emergency situation. If injuries are severe seek a first aid kit for medical help. During

electrical fire a fire extinguisher should be used to extinguish the fire.

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIII.     List emergency response contact information:

·         Call 911 for injuries, fires or other emergency situations

·         Call your department representative to report a facility concern

Name

 

Phone Number

 

Faculty or other COE emergency contact

 

Phone Number

Dr. McConomy

 

850-410-6624

 

Faculty

 

 

Dr. Hooker

 

850-410-6363

 

Faculty

 

 

Dr. Devine

 

850-410-6378

 

Faculty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IX.       Safety review signatures

·         Faculty Review update (required for project changes and as specified by faculty mentor)

·         Updated safety reviews should occur for the following reasons:

1.     Faculty requires second review by this date:

2.     Faculty requires discussion and possibly a new safety review BEFORE proceeding with step(s)

3.     An accident or unexpected event has occurred (these must be reported to the faculty, who will decide if a new safety review should be performed.

4.     Changes have been made to the project.

Team Member

 

Date

 

Faculty mentor

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report all accidents and near misses to faculty mentor.